sigmaleph: (Default)
[personal profile] sigmaleph
much of the 'online misinformation' discourse ultimately reduces to the fact that if you let people say things, sometimes they will say things that aren't true

like i just saw john oliver's latest bit on misinformation spreading on whatsapp and wechat and such and, yeah, sure. they are messaging apps! they let you talk to people, ergo you can say things that aren't true there

if your aunt isn't sending you covid conspiracy theories on whatsapp then she's just gonna tell you about them over the dinner table. this is not in any meaningful sense whatsapp's responsibility. there is nothing they should do about it.

i don't have a magic solution to make people stop believing bullshit. it's a hard problem. but pointing at the latest thing people use to communicate and blaming it definitely isn't it

(and darkly hinting about how it's end-to-end encrypted and this prevents the company from moderating it is somehow even worse than the previous fearmongering about how encryption means the government can't spy on terrorists)

Date: 2021-10-15 06:11 am (UTC)
yvannairie: :3 (Default)
From: [personal profile] yvannairie

Yeah, WhatsApp was a terrible example b/c it's not a public platform, that's like saying cell service providers need to be screening phone calls. I was very frustrated b/c the points about fact checking in non-English languages were good otherwise, generally b/c stuff like YT facts banner and the Twitter misinfo banner are non-destructive and non-censoring, and give people just enough rope to hang their respectability if they keep arguing against them. But WhatsApp is effectively an email service.

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Profile

sigmaleph: (Default)
sigmaleph

June 2022

S M T W T F S
    1234
567 891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Page generated Feb. 7th, 2026 01:28 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios